RUSSIA SPY SCANDAL: NOW WE KNOW THE TRUTH!

If there was any doubt that this whole poison spy scandal was a false flag... now we have the evidence that it is .

note... chemical weapons... who stands to gain the most?

In the great game as it is called you must be a great chess player... and this false flag from Salisbury is exactly that. Instead of being treated like a normal criminal investigation and THEN taking this evidence further ... it was treated as an opportunity to punish Russia. It is odd that suddenly 77 people have been killed in Syria by what is said .." air delivered barrel bombs" - we still dont know if that is true yet either - why? because no independent persons have been allowed into the site where this atrocity took place.

But all fingers point to Assad. And Russia has said... lets deal with Isis FIRST ... and in Syria- there isn't much difference between the aims of ISIS and the aims of the rebels. Some might say..they are one and the same. In any case... with the imminent defeat of the rebels ... by the Russian backed ASS-add REGIME... WHO would stand to gain the most form using chemical weapons?

Its simple. Those who want to retake the geo political arena back - and thereby the energy security... is exactly ..who? its either Russia - Iran or ... America and Britain.

And if there is going to be a major conflict in the region- what better way to shore up support than by discrediting Russia by a false flag? - that is if war is on the horizon....

What are the goals of the West in the region? :

1. Neuter Iran.
2.Squash Assad.
3. Protect energy sources by ensuring a presence.
4. Destroying Isis and other fanatic Islamic terrorists. eg hisbolla.

And Russia?

1. Ensuring a local base in Syria continues to remain as a logistical port for future operations.
2. Protecting oil pipelines and energy security.
3. Destroying Islamic fascists  like Isis...
4. Increasing the influence of Russia in the region particularly with Iran.

So anyone can see those basic goals clash.

Lets look at World war One . Many analysts have said it is preposterous to make a comparison. But look what has happened... a guy was assassinated ... and all the nations of Europe went to war... in those days Germany was the Russia of today. And Britain was the America of the day.

So they went to war...

over the murder of some guy called archduke Ferdinand...

now we have the attempted murder of our modern day equivalent... except now the finger is - without a court case... without a proper criminal investigation... is unequivocally pointed at PUTIN... no hard proof- just hearsay. That is how the British justice system convicts people these days... it used to have to pass the credibility test and been proven in a court of law ...beyond reasonable doubt... we had BAD intelligence - using EXACTLY the same methods that led us going into Iraq ... in 2003 because of alleged weapons of mass destruction- which turned out to be FAKE...

Tony Blair turned out to be a bare faced liar.

Now without due legal process... "Buffoon Boris and Theresa the Terrible" have decided... its 100 % a state sponsored assassination...

but its not credible. Anyone with half a brain cell knows it isnt... and these are all supposedly educated people...

one movement please... take a deep breath...slowly in... and out...

1. Who was Skipal exchanged for? - a nobody- anna chapman.
2. If they really wanted him that bad ... why didnt they off him in a russian prison cell years ago ?
3. If they wanted to off him now... why use a botched up chemical attack? - amateur...give the Russians some credit please. They are better than that.  I mean the evidence" was overwhelming- even the policeman who was helping the victims was hurt... a professional hit would leave no trace. This was so loud ... it was deafening... the bread crumbs are too many. Thats not how the Russian KGB work. They simply would have visited his house and taken him for a ride in the country... or lured him to Russia... but either way... it would be a car accident or the guy would have hanged himself... or a heart attack in bed... - not in a public restaurant ... and the shit everywhere... no thats stupid..and thats not how the FSB would do it. This has a red flag all over it.
4. Motive : who would do it? - a colleague from the old days... thats who. And it would be an independent job. Thats where the investigation should go towards...probably this colleague gave her laced stuff in her present ...or maybe even the guys daughter works for mi 6... at the end of the day...nobody got killed. no one was harmed irreversibly. Could have been anyone.
5. Putin was KGB and he thinks like KGB... and even in america.,.. traitors get the death penalty... and in ancient greece poison was given to those who poiosoned the youth... eg socrates. Its an hisotirc method symbolising speech- talk ---- and changing of minds... so whoever did it ...and I think it probably was an embittered collegue from the old days... it certainly wasnt Putin. Its a culture. He wouldnt need to say yes or no... no need.
6. The speed with which britian jumped up and down and pointed the finger at russia ... and suddenly ... we have syria... after this affair has got support form 10-20 nations... it shows me ... hey... this is a set up...

PUTIN HAS BEEN FITTED UP.

7. Finally- info wars... the russia investigation into the american elections...who was pushing that ? clinton..obama ... and now its being shored up this event... its all too coincidental to be believable... and the media..the mainscrema media ... shouting out the party line..thank god we have the internet these days... in 1914... there was only the newspaper... an independent thinker would have been shouted down.

So what is my conclusions?

1. This was not a state sponsored hit. In fact the only one who benefits from blaming Russia ... and from this incident... is not Russia but the war mongers who seek to push Russias face in the dirt and take it down a peg or two... the British establishment chief of which is B J ( not blow job ) - & Co... and the American CFR.

2.  Assad must go...and Iran must be neutered..yes... but trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the British public to go into another dirty war... thats criminal!

3. And if it was Putin who ordered it... why havnt the normal politcal protocols been observed? surely before you kick someone out of the country- your accuser presents overwhelming evidence... - the foreign office hasnt done so yet...

4. Everyone has a right to face their accusers. Britian has acted cowardly by refusing access to question the skipals or analyse the samples from the poisoning.

No. This incident was probably one of many that goes on but this time ... the cobra decided they can use it politically to put pressure on russia and build an alliance against it... like what happened in World War one...

Some things never change.

To accuse Russia of state sponsored assassination is underestimating the intelligence of Putin and others who are not that stupid. They know how to play chess.