Mission accomplished....!-Was Syria missile strike a success-or not ?

With so much conflicting information out there...the narrative coming from the Russians is that the missile strike on Syria was a complete failure. Only 30 missiles reaching their targets- over 70 shot down... so what is the truth? - and on top of that they showed the so called targets that were apparently vacated a year ago and hit by Israeli jets already ... and said those that did hit... hit empty buildings with no people or equipment...effectively a waste of 165 million dollars.

It is sad to see also that one chemical test on the nerve agent says that Buzz or BZ was used in the Salisbury attack. But the Swiss lab of the OCPW have said that some components of novichok were in the analysis. Effectively, again ... the closed investigation in the UK has brought into question the authenticity of the intelligence and we now are being asked the question...is this a false flag and does the military intelligence community really want to create tension with Russia...

In the end we will have to say that this missile strike was a PR exercise. It might fool some people... but not others who are prepared to question the facts. We must also ask ourselves... what is the REAL agenda in Syria?  Who stands to gain from this show of force... and is it really a show of force?

My thinking is that it is. Russias influence in the region is growing with its alliance with Iran and Syria. Soon that may grow ... perhaps China. Perhaps Pakistan... and even perhaps Turkey. But - if this is so... what does it mean for Israel? - one thing I always realsied when I visited Megiddo valley and overlooked it from the Carmel - the third world war will be a land war and a tactical one. If the Russians are drawn into a big all out war - it would have to be in their national interest. They would not do so otherwise... but the propaganda is flying both ways... and no one really knows who is telling the truth anymore. Thats the big problem.

If anything we need to hold the mainstream media to account and our governments who waste tax payers money on useless exercises. If you are asking folks to go out...especially young soldiers to die for their country... dont send them out on useless exercises of your own making...

We need to absolutely question everything about this missile strike because next time it will be more stream lined and everyone will be banging on the war drums and no one will be thinking anymore... and thats the main issue...

Its all very well telling your people... our brave soldiers lets honour them... but when you send them out for a useless war to get killed...thats NOT brave..thats criminal. Stupid and irresponsible.

Britain and America have spent much of the last 200 years fighting all over the world. Perhaps now its the time to use some of that money to developing the domestic economy and looking after the citizens of that country - sending unemployed people to war so you can cull the population is not a good thing. When you talk about morality..remember the Great War..the war to end wars... much of that was on false intelligence. Much of that was nationalistic ego and adventurism... those poor soldiers in the trenches died in the thousands... millions... and what happened at the end ? -

If you were to speak to any of the survivors they would have said more or less the same thing... " we fight war never to go to war- and lets do our best not to jump into it. "

RUSSIA SPY SCANDAL: NOW WE KNOW THE TRUTH!

If there was any doubt that this whole poison spy scandal was a false flag... now we have the evidence that it is .

note... chemical weapons... who stands to gain the most?

In the great game as it is called you must be a great chess player... and this false flag from Salisbury is exactly that. Instead of being treated like a normal criminal investigation and THEN taking this evidence further ... it was treated as an opportunity to punish Russia. It is odd that suddenly 77 people have been killed in Syria by what is said .." air delivered barrel bombs" - we still dont know if that is true yet either - why? because no independent persons have been allowed into the site where this atrocity took place.

But all fingers point to Assad. And Russia has said... lets deal with Isis FIRST ... and in Syria- there isn't much difference between the aims of ISIS and the aims of the rebels. Some might say..they are one and the same. In any case... with the imminent defeat of the rebels ... by the Russian backed ASS-add REGIME... WHO would stand to gain the most form using chemical weapons?

Its simple. Those who want to retake the geo political arena back - and thereby the energy security... is exactly ..who? its either Russia - Iran or ... America and Britain.

And if there is going to be a major conflict in the region- what better way to shore up support than by discrediting Russia by a false flag? - that is if war is on the horizon....

What are the goals of the West in the region? :

1. Neuter Iran.
2.Squash Assad.
3. Protect energy sources by ensuring a presence.
4. Destroying Isis and other fanatic Islamic terrorists. eg hisbolla.

And Russia?

1. Ensuring a local base in Syria continues to remain as a logistical port for future operations.
2. Protecting oil pipelines and energy security.
3. Destroying Islamic fascists  like Isis...
4. Increasing the influence of Russia in the region particularly with Iran.

So anyone can see those basic goals clash.

Lets look at World war One . Many analysts have said it is preposterous to make a comparison. But look what has happened... a guy was assassinated ... and all the nations of Europe went to war... in those days Germany was the Russia of today. And Britain was the America of the day.

So they went to war...

over the murder of some guy called archduke Ferdinand...

now we have the attempted murder of our modern day equivalent... except now the finger is - without a court case... without a proper criminal investigation... is unequivocally pointed at PUTIN... no hard proof- just hearsay. That is how the British justice system convicts people these days... it used to have to pass the credibility test and been proven in a court of law ...beyond reasonable doubt... we had BAD intelligence - using EXACTLY the same methods that led us going into Iraq ... in 2003 because of alleged weapons of mass destruction- which turned out to be FAKE...

Tony Blair turned out to be a bare faced liar.

Now without due legal process... "Buffoon Boris and Theresa the Terrible" have decided... its 100 % a state sponsored assassination...

but its not credible. Anyone with half a brain cell knows it isnt... and these are all supposedly educated people...

one movement please... take a deep breath...slowly in... and out...

1. Who was Skipal exchanged for? - a nobody- anna chapman.
2. If they really wanted him that bad ... why didnt they off him in a russian prison cell years ago ?
3. If they wanted to off him now... why use a botched up chemical attack? - amateur...give the Russians some credit please. They are better than that.  I mean the evidence" was overwhelming- even the policeman who was helping the victims was hurt... a professional hit would leave no trace. This was so loud ... it was deafening... the bread crumbs are too many. Thats not how the Russian KGB work. They simply would have visited his house and taken him for a ride in the country... or lured him to Russia... but either way... it would be a car accident or the guy would have hanged himself... or a heart attack in bed... - not in a public restaurant ... and the shit everywhere... no thats stupid..and thats not how the FSB would do it. This has a red flag all over it.
4. Motive : who would do it? - a colleague from the old days... thats who. And it would be an independent job. Thats where the investigation should go towards...probably this colleague gave her laced stuff in her present ...or maybe even the guys daughter works for mi 6... at the end of the day...nobody got killed. no one was harmed irreversibly. Could have been anyone.
5. Putin was KGB and he thinks like KGB... and even in america.,.. traitors get the death penalty... and in ancient greece poison was given to those who poiosoned the youth... eg socrates. Its an hisotirc method symbolising speech- talk ---- and changing of minds... so whoever did it ...and I think it probably was an embittered collegue from the old days... it certainly wasnt Putin. Its a culture. He wouldnt need to say yes or no... no need.
6. The speed with which britian jumped up and down and pointed the finger at russia ... and suddenly ... we have syria... after this affair has got support form 10-20 nations... it shows me ... hey... this is a set up...

PUTIN HAS BEEN FITTED UP.

7. Finally- info wars... the russia investigation into the american elections...who was pushing that ? clinton..obama ... and now its being shored up this event... its all too coincidental to be believable... and the media..the mainscrema media ... shouting out the party line..thank god we have the internet these days... in 1914... there was only the newspaper... an independent thinker would have been shouted down.

So what is my conclusions?

1. This was not a state sponsored hit. In fact the only one who benefits from blaming Russia ... and from this incident... is not Russia but the war mongers who seek to push Russias face in the dirt and take it down a peg or two... the British establishment chief of which is B J ( not blow job ) - & Co... and the American CFR.

2.  Assad must go...and Iran must be neutered..yes... but trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the British public to go into another dirty war... thats criminal!

3. And if it was Putin who ordered it... why havnt the normal politcal protocols been observed? surely before you kick someone out of the country- your accuser presents overwhelming evidence... - the foreign office hasnt done so yet...

4. Everyone has a right to face their accusers. Britian has acted cowardly by refusing access to question the skipals or analyse the samples from the poisoning.

No. This incident was probably one of many that goes on but this time ... the cobra decided they can use it politically to put pressure on russia and build an alliance against it... like what happened in World War one...

Some things never change.

To accuse Russia of state sponsored assassination is underestimating the intelligence of Putin and others who are not that stupid. They know how to play chess.